Compare
Islo vs Daytona
Daytona is optimized for fast sandboxes and Computer Use. Islo targets long-running autonomous workflows with gateway and verification.
Daytona is optimized for speed-first cloud sandboxes, Computer Use, and eval workloads. Islo layers gateway policies, credential injection, and unattended orchestration on top of persistent agent computers.
| Islo | Daytona | |
|---|---|---|
Isolated compute | ✓ | ✓ |
Optimized for sandbox speed | ✓ | ✓ |
Persistent dev environments Snapshots available | ✓ | partial |
Computer Use | — | ✓ |
Gateway credential injection | ✓ | — |
Agent eval / benchmark support | ✓ | ✓ |
Ticket-to-PR workflows | ✓ | — |
Content filters on egress | ✓ | — |
BYOC / your VPC | ✓ | partial |
Choose Islo when
Your agents need scoped tool access, verification against real services, and audit for security review.
Choose Daytona when
You want sandboxes optimized for speed and eval workloads, with Computer Use, without building orchestration.
Related on Islo
Try Islo on your next workflow.
Common questions
Is Islo a drop-in replacement for Daytona?
Daytona is optimized for speed-first cloud sandboxes, Computer Use, and eval workloads. Islo layers gateway policies, credential injection, and unattended orchestration on top of persistent agent computers.
Can I try both before deciding?
Yes. Start with one workflow you understand on Islo and compare results against your current setup.
Does Islo work with my existing harness?
Islo is harness-agnostic. Run Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, or your own agent.
What about pricing?
Islo is pay-as-you-go. See /pricing for rates.
Can I run in my own cloud?
Yes. BYOC mode runs agent computers in your VPC.